ButlerBlog

chad butler's weblog

  • About
  • Blog
  • WordPress Plugins
  • Contact

WP-Members™ 2.3.2 Bug Fix – Apostrophe/Quotation marks in dialogs

By Chad Butler 7 Comments

Following the release of WP-Members 2.3.2, there was a bug brought to my attention by an astute user:

If you are using apostrophes in the custom dialog messages via the plugin’s admin panel, there will be slashes put into your content as the plugin neglects to clean up user input with “stripslashes.”  This bug actually effects all releases from 2.2.0 on to 2.3.2.

This has been address in my next release (which will include bug fixes, but will also be a feature release as we add CAPTCHA).  In the meantime, if it effects you, you can make some simple changes to correct it:

Change line 28 of wp-members-dialogs.php from:

<?php echo $wpmem_dialogs[0]; ?>

to:

<?php echo stripslashes($wpmem_dialogs[0]); ?>

Change line 195 of wp-member-admin.php from:

<textarea id="" name="<?php echo " rows="3" cols="50"><?php echo $wpmem_dialogs[$row]; ?></textarea>

to:

<textarea id="" name="<?php echo " rows="3" cols="50"><?php echo stripslashes($wpmem_dialogs[$row]); ?></textarea>

Hope this helps.

  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • More
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest

Filed Under: WP-Members Tagged With: plugins, WordPress, WP-Members

Statement regarding the use of the name wp-Member by SmartMediaPro

By Chad Butler Leave a Comment

I recently became aware of a plugin using the name wp-Member.  This has come to my attention in the form of support issues posted in the wordpress.org forum and tagged wp-members (my plugin).  “[Plugin: WP-Members] Broken upon install — support not helpful — don’t buy.”

While that specific post has since been removed at the request of the original poster since it was not in fact referencing my WP-Members plugin, it makes evident a more important issue.  The plugin this user was actually referencing was not mine, but rather a plugin called wp-Member, offered by SmartMediaPro, and this is not the first occurrence of such confusion.

WP-Members vs. wp-Member

To make this as clear as possible, I will use the names specifically as they are marketed.  WP-Members is the plugin developed and released by me.  It is maintained in the official WordPress Plugin Repository.  It is both free and open source.  If a user of the forums on wordpress.org tags their post wp-members it will be tagged to my plugin (and my attention).  In contrast, the wp-Member plugin is a commercial plugin from SmartMediaPro.  It is neither free nor open source.  The issues that have been posted in the wordpress.org forums seem to stem from the fact that they require the installation of ionCube, a tool for encrypting php source code.

It is very clear that these two names amount to what is known in trademark law as “confusing similarity.”  A similar concept is “likelihood of confusion.”  It should be obvious that, since these two products are active in the same marketplace, there is most certainly likelihood of confusion and confusing similarity.

Date of First Use

In order to emphasize that my date of first use of the name WP-Members precedes that of SmartMediaPro’s wp-Member, I have, where possible, referenced third party links for date claims.  I find purchase viagra online this to be more accurate and reliable than the timestamp on an individual blog.

When the original WP-Members plugin was released publicly, there were no other membership-focused plugins for WordPress of which I am aware, let alone any called WP-Members (or wp-Member).  The May 31, 2006 beta release announcement is not only documented on my blog, but also documented by third party archive.org.  The plugin’s page was first bookmarked by a user on bookmarking site delicious.com June 27, 2006 and listed in the WordPress Codex as early as July 13, 2006 as cached at archive.org. WP-Members was approved and added to the the official wordpress.org repository on 12/15/2007 as documented in WordPress’s subversion tracking.

In contrast, SmartMediaPro announced their release of wp-Member v1.1 on wp-member.com on August 27, 2008.  That seems to be the earliest post on the blog.  The domain was registered on July 7, 2008 (they also registered wp-members.com in 2010).  I cannot find a commercial use of the name prior to 2008.

If that is the case, it places my first use of WP-Members a full 2 years prior to their release and my inclusion in the wordpress.org plugin repository 7 months prior to their domain name purchase (the earliest date).

Going Forward

While this confusion does hurt both parties, I am doing what I can to create separation.  Understand that I have absolutely no relationship with SmartMediaPro nor the plugin wp-Member.  Additionally, based what I have outlined above, I do not believe that SmartMediaPro has a legitimate claim to the name WP-Members.

Although a commercial, pro version is in development, The Original WP-Members will remain a free product and will continue to be open source.  If the WP-Members that you are using was not free and is not open source, it’s not the original and official version.

  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • More
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest

Filed Under: WP-Members Tagged With: plugins, WordPress, WP-Members

WP-Members readme file update

By Chad Butler 1 Comment

It was pointed out by an astute user in the wordpress.org forums that my readme file had a mistake…

http://wordpress.org/support/topic/plugin-wp-members-not-blocking-pages

I basically wrote things backward in the readme file.

Had I worded it correctly, it is supposed to be intuitive:

  • if default = block then unblock = true to unblock

-OR-

  • if default = unblock, block = true to block
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • More
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest

Filed Under: WP-Members Tagged With: plugins, WordPress, WP-Members

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • …
  • 36
  • Next Page »

Join Us!

I will never share your information. No spam. No junk. No kidding. Unsubscribe anytime.

Recent Posts:

  • The High Price of Free Plugins
  • YouTube Success: Key Tips for Enhancing Video Optimization and Visibility
  • Mobile App vs. Mobile Website Ideal Choice for your Business
  • Top Strategies to Boost Your Brand’s Visibility and Impact
  • Advanced Blogging Strategies: Using Analytics, A/B Testing, and Conversion Optimization Techniques to Grow Your Audience
  • Unlock Real-Time Process Insights to Save Time and Money
  • How Writers Can Attract More Audience Attention
  • Dress for Success – Even at Home
  • Mastering the Art of Crafting SMART Marketing Goals
  • Rediscover Your Brand Story: 7 Tips for Refreshing Your Company Identity

Archives

  • About
  • Blog
  • Archive
  • Contact

Site powered by WordPress, running on the Genesis Framework from StudioPress.

Unless otherwise noted, content on this site is © 2006-2026 ButlerBlog and may not be reproduced without express written permission from the author.

Some content may include affiliate links for which this site receives a small commission.