ButlerBlog

chad butler's weblog

  • About
  • Blog
  • WordPress Plugins
  • Contact

Archives for October 2010

Statement regarding the use of the name wp-Member by SmartMediaPro

By Chad Butler Leave a Comment

I recently became aware of a plugin using the name wp-Member.  This has come to my attention in the form of support issues posted in the wordpress.org forum and tagged wp-members (my plugin).  “[Plugin: WP-Members] Broken upon install — support not helpful — don’t buy.”

While that specific post has since been removed at the request of the original poster since it was not in fact referencing my WP-Members plugin, it makes evident a more important issue.  The plugin this user was actually referencing was not mine, but rather a plugin called wp-Member, offered by SmartMediaPro, and this is not the first occurrence of such confusion.

WP-Members vs. wp-Member

To make this as clear as possible, I will use the names specifically as they are marketed.  WP-Members is the plugin developed and released by me.  It is maintained in the official WordPress Plugin Repository.  It is both free and open source.  If a user of the forums on wordpress.org tags their post wp-members it will be tagged to my plugin (and my attention).  In contrast, the wp-Member plugin is a commercial plugin from SmartMediaPro.  It is neither free nor open source.  The issues that have been posted in the wordpress.org forums seem to stem from the fact that they require the installation of ionCube, a tool for encrypting php source code.

It is very clear that these two names amount to what is known in trademark law as “confusing similarity.”  A similar concept is “likelihood of confusion.”  It should be obvious that, since these two products are active in the same marketplace, there is most certainly likelihood of confusion and confusing similarity.

Date of First Use

In order to emphasize that my date of first use of the name WP-Members precedes that of SmartMediaPro’s wp-Member, I have, where possible, referenced third party links for date claims.  I find purchase viagra online this to be more accurate and reliable than the timestamp on an individual blog.

When the original WP-Members plugin was released publicly, there were no other membership-focused plugins for WordPress of which I am aware, let alone any called WP-Members (or wp-Member).  The May 31, 2006 beta release announcement is not only documented on my blog, but also documented by third party archive.org.  The plugin’s page was first bookmarked by a user on bookmarking site delicious.com June 27, 2006 and listed in the WordPress Codex as early as July 13, 2006 as cached at archive.org. WP-Members was approved and added to the the official wordpress.org repository on 12/15/2007 as documented in WordPress’s subversion tracking.

In contrast, SmartMediaPro announced their release of wp-Member v1.1 on wp-member.com on August 27, 2008.  That seems to be the earliest post on the blog.  The domain was registered on July 7, 2008 (they also registered wp-members.com in 2010).  I cannot find a commercial use of the name prior to 2008.

If that is the case, it places my first use of WP-Members a full 2 years prior to their release and my inclusion in the wordpress.org plugin repository 7 months prior to their domain name purchase (the earliest date).

Going Forward

While this confusion does hurt both parties, I am doing what I can to create separation.  Understand that I have absolutely no relationship with SmartMediaPro nor the plugin wp-Member.  Additionally, based what I have outlined above, I do not believe that SmartMediaPro has a legitimate claim to the name WP-Members.

Although a commercial, pro version is in development, The Original WP-Members will remain a free product and will continue to be open source.  If the WP-Members that you are using was not free and is not open source, it’s not the original and official version.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Print
  • More
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • Pinterest

Filed Under: WP-Members Tagged With: plugins, WordPress, WP-Members

WP-Members readme file update

By Chad Butler 1 Comment

It was pointed out by an astute user in the wordpress.org forums that my readme file had a mistake…

http://wordpress.org/support/topic/plugin-wp-members-not-blocking-pages

I basically wrote things backward in the readme file.

Had I worded it correctly, it is supposed to be intuitive:

  • if default = block then unblock = true to unblock

-OR-

  • if default = unblock, block = true to block
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Print
  • More
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • Pinterest

Filed Under: WP-Members Tagged With: plugins, WordPress, WP-Members

WP-Members to include reCAPTCHA

By Chad Butler 5 Comments

There has been a recurring feature request for some type of CAPTCHA support in the WP-Members membership plugin.  I have held off for awhile as I needed to make some decisions on which direction to go on this project.  I could reinvent the wheel by creating an internal CAPTCHA process unique to WP-Members, but that’s not really appealing for a multitude of reasons.  I had requests to support specific existing WP CAPTCHA plugins, but that wasn’t really a workable possibility either as I would have to pick one to support at the expense of others, or I would support multiple thereby complicating the process.

I settled on including reCAPTCHA.  This decision was made for a number of reasons.  First, it’s a widget that I can easily include in the existing code without too much recoding.  This means I don’t have to reinvent the wheel.  I like that!

Second, and just as important, I like the fact that it is supported by Google Labs.  This provides some long-term viability.  I like that, too!

I’ve already got some tests running, so I might have this ready to release sooner than expected.  I’ll let everyone know when I have a target date.  Honestly, the CAPTCHA part works fine.  The heavy lifting is going to be programming this to be an optional parameter in the plugin and accommodating users who are upgrading without screwing up their existing installs (always a challenge that too many plugin authors overlook).

Because WP-Members is used in a variety of applications, I can’t assume that users don’t already use reCAPTCHA in some form or another on their site already.  So another challenge will be to make sure this addition does not collide with other potential possibilities (i.e. users of the WP-reCAPTCHA plugin or others).  I found that when I tried to test various other plugins that I got collisions if both were installed.  So, I’ll need to be testing that as well.

If you’re not familiar with CAPTCHA and why you should use it, here’s some background:

  • Wikipedia
  • Official CAPTCHA site
  • Google reCAPTCHA site (you’ll need an API from here)
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Print
  • More
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Tumblr
  • Pocket
  • Pinterest

Filed Under: WP-Members Tagged With: plugins, WordPress, WP-Members

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Next Page »

Join Us!

I will never share your information. No spam. No junk. No kidding. Unsubscribe anytime.

Recent Posts:

  • YouTube Success: Key Tips for Enhancing Video Optimization and Visibility
  • Mobile App vs. Mobile Website Ideal Choice for your Business
  • Top Strategies to Boost Your Brand’s Visibility and Impact
  • Advanced Blogging Strategies: Using Analytics, A/B Testing, and Conversion Optimization Techniques to Grow Your Audience
  • Unlock Real-Time Process Insights to Save Time and Money
  • How Writers Can Attract More Audience Attention
  • Dress for Success – Even at Home
  • Mastering the Art of Crafting SMART Marketing Goals
  • Rediscover Your Brand Story: 7 Tips for Refreshing Your Company Identity
  • Creating Engaging Content: Tips for a Successful Content Marketing Strategy

Archives

  • About
  • Blog
  • Archive
  • Contact

Site powered by WordPress, running on the Genesis Framework from StudioPress.

Unless otherwise noted, content on this site is © 2006-2025 ButlerBlog and may not be reproduced without express written permission from the author.

Some content may include affiliate links for which this site receives a small commission.